Frog Diversity in Various Habitats of Iracambi
Stephanie Rog
INTRODUCTION
- Brazil boasts 731 amphibian species, the largest
number in the world, of which 467 are endemic.
In some ecosystems they are the most abundant
vertebrates (Blaunstein et al. 1994) and so their absence can
have consequences for the entire ecological community.
- Frogs are considered to be particularly vulnerable
to habitat change and good indicators of habitat quality due to their
permeable skins, dual life mode and limited dispersal capabilities.
- A decline in frog populations was first reported
by
herpetologists in the late 1970's (Barinaga 1990, Bury
1999) and appeared to be occurring on a global scale. Alarmingly,
frogs have reportedly disappeared from pristine areas or areas
presumed to be undisturbed by human interference (Carey et al.
2001).
- Understanding factors that determine amphibian
species distributions allows informed decisions to be made in
conservation, increases our understanding of how land management
impacts on amphibian species and therefore contributes towards
understanding amphibian decline and rarity on a wider scale.
OBJECTIVE
To
complete a pioneering survey of the diversity of frog species at
Iracambi, and to study their habitat preferences. The specific
objectives were:
- Determine the different land uses at Iracambi
Describe the research areas using IUCN criteria
(vegetation, disturbance etc.)
Collect water samples in research areas to analyze
and draw conclusions regarding habitat health
Record all frog species found in the different
research areas, along with information on microhabitat, and climate
- Record frog calls and build a database combining
sounds, pictures and biological information
The hypotheses tested were:
- Frog diversity would be the highest within
twenty-five meters of a water source and with little disturbance
from human activities
- The most species and highest abundance would be
found during rainfall
METHODOLOGY
Nine study sites were selected that
represented all of the different land use types occurring at Iracambi.
These included Eucalyptus plantations, sugar cane fields, secondary
forest, artificial and temporary pools, and pasture. This study was carried out between the 25
th of October 2004 and the 26 th of February 2005. Collection occurred
daily between 2000 and 2200 in all types of weather. Frogs were detected by using visual
encounter and/or acoustic survey techniques (standardized transect
sampling). Information recorded included a location of the species
(recorded using GPS), microhabitat, abundance of species (by counting
calls), climate information including precipitation and cloud cover, a
digital picture and a vocalization recording.
After hearing or observing a frog, a
picture was taken and then the researcher attempted to net a specimen
for identification. Live specimens were used whenever possible to
identify the species, but if capture was not possible, then the picture
or the sound recordings were used as a secondary identification method.
| Frog species of
Iracambi |
|
|
Scientific name |
|
1 |
Bufo |
|
2 |
Elachtistocheis ovalis |
|
3 |
Eleutherodactylus binota |
|
4 |
Eleutherodactylus sp. |
|
5 |
Hyla albomarginata |
|
6 |
Hyla albopunctata |
|
7 |
Hyla crepitans |
|
8 |
Hyla faber |
|
9 |
Hyla leucophyllata |
|
10 |
Hyla minuta |
|
11 |
Hyla pardalis juv. |
|
12 |
Hyla saborni |
|
13 |
Leptodactylus ocellatus |
|
14 |
Phyllomedusa burmeisteri |
|
15 |
Physalaemus curveiri |
|
16 |
Scinax euridice |
|
17 |
Scinax perereca |
|
18 |
Scinax fuscovarious |
|
19 |
Scinax cf. Berthae |
|
20 |
Scinax cuspidatus |
|
21 |
Hyla semilineata |
|
22 |
Hyalinobatrachium |
|
RESULTS
Twenty-two different species were
found over a period of forty-five days. The most popular habitat
site was a shallow temporary pool with smooth edges, covered with
reeds, grass and a few trees. There was no visible disturbance by
humans and three of the species were endemic to this area. The Eucalyptus plantation and a
shallow temporary pool with a high aquatic iron concentration did
not support any frog species, and the sugar cane field only
supported one. Temperature had no effect on thirteen
species, and weather seemed to have no effect on all of the
species except Phyllomedusa burmeisteri, which was only observed
on clear nights with no precipitation. The most common species were Scinax
euridice, Scinax cf Berthae, Hyla minuta and Hyla punctata, which
were observed almost every night. The rarest species were Hyla
pardalis, Physalaemus curveiri and Scinax sp. which were only
encountered once.
Water sampling results indicated that
the iron concentration was high in a majority of the samples, but
the pH, nitrate and turbidity levels were all acceptable except in
sample 2, which corresponds to the area where no species were
found.
Water Samples |
Number |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Units |
Colour |
* |
83 |
16 |
13 |
9 |
18 |
37 |
U.C |
Iron |
22,3 |
4,3 |
0,35 |
0,65 |
0,53 |
0,18 |
2,9 |
mg/L Fe |
Nitrate |
4,5 |
1,4 |
1,3 |
1,6 |
<1,0 |
1 |
1,7 |
mg/L NO 3 |
Ph |
6,56 |
6,16 |
6,21 |
7,05 |
6,43 |
6,98 |
5,99 |
|
Turbidity |
* |
27 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
11 |
N.T.U |
|
| |
|
DISCUSSION
This
initial survey of Iracambi's frog population is by no means exhaustive
but provides the organization and future researchers with a platform
from which to conduct further research. The frog species occurrence in
relation to weather and temperature was not scientifically valuable
because some species were rarely encountered. Frogs are highly secretive
in their habits and may spend their entire lives underground or on
inaccessible mountain slopes. Their activities are highly seasonal and
in tropical species, breeding may occur over an extended period of time.
Future research should once again focus on the breeding season. Changes in the ecosystem are first noticed
by amphibians, thus by monitoring frog populations these changes can be
detected at an early stage. This is one way for humans to monitor the
effects of their activities and prevent future problems.
REFERENCES
Barinaga, M. (1990) Where
have all the Froggies gone? Science , 247 ,
1033 – 1034 Bury, R.B. (1999). A
historical perspective and critique of the declining amphibian crisis.
Wildlife Society Bulletin , 27 , 1064-1068.
Carey, C., Heyer,
R. Wilkinson, J., Alford, R., Arntzen, J., Halliday, T., Hungerfod, L.,
Lips, K., Middleton, E., Orchard, S. & Rand, A. (2001) Amphibian
declines and environmental change: use of remote sensing data to
identify environmental correlates. Conservation Biology ,
15 , 903-913.
|